Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The Lasting Legacy of Mr. James Bond

*I wrote this as a piece of "Bond coverage" for my school newspaper leading up to the release of Skyfall. The second part is here and the review of Skyfall is here.

Before I loved music, long before I could adequately formulate thoughts in writing and prior to building an appreciation of film on any significant level, I was still a fan of James Bond. That fandom, for myself and for many other members of my generation, undoubtedly began with the Goldeneye 007 videogame on the Nintendo 64, a pop-cultural stepping stone that consumed many hours of many lives, whether we were blasting our way through the single player campaign (again and again) or staying up until three in the morning with friends, eating junk-food and yelling at each other over intense multiplayer shootouts.

I have long since outgrown videogames, but James Bond has stayed with me. I began delving into the films during my childhood (despite possibly inappropriate connotations), taping the movies off television airings during the big “Bond week” marathons, renting VHS copies of the Connery classics with my brother and even buying a “Bond encyclopedia” of sorts following the release of 1999’s The World is Not Enough. Revisiting the films now, I realize just how much about them I missed, how silly the plots, as a general rule, often become, how comical the villains sometimes are and just how many women Mr. Bond…ummm…“seduces.” But I also am amazed at just how well some of the older entries in the series hold up. Make no mistake, there is no “perfect” James Bond film (though two or three certainly came close to mastering the formula), but almost every entry in the series has its redeeming qualities, be they memorable villains, unforgettable one-liners or pieces of double entendre or, especially, still-stellar action sequences.

The James Bond film franchise reached a major milestone last month, celebrating the 50th anniversary of Dr. No, which introduced Sean Connery as the first man to play Ian Fleming’s iconic literary spy on the big screen. 23 films (24 if we count the unofficial Connery-starring “Never Say Never Again”), six actors and a plethora of destroyed cars and gadgets later, the franchise lives on, and this Friday, film no. 23, mysteriously entitled Skyfall, will finally see its United States release date.

For awhile there, it seemed like Bond wasn’t going to get the chance to continue, at least not with actor Daniel Craig in the lead role. A late-decade writer’s strike hindered the production of 2008’s Quantum of Solace, an underwhelming (but still solid) stall-out for a series that had so promisingly rebooted itself only two years previous with Casino Royale. And then, to make matters worse, MGM went bankrupt, a disaster that came at the worst possible time and kept James Bond out of the theaters for four years. Questions arose whether or not Craig would reprise the role, whether Bond 23 would ever happen and, if it did, whether we would have to wait a very long time for it to come to fruition. Suddenly, 2006’s promising restart seemed like it was going to get swept away by the tide.

But it would take nothing short of Armageddon to stop the James Bond machine, which, over the past 50 years, has become the most successful film franchise of all time out of sheer force of longevity. Sure, the Harry Potter films made more in ticket sales, but figure in inflation and there’s simply no question of who wins the dogfight.

Other heroes have come and gone. The Indiana Joneses, the Jason Bournes, the Captain Jack Sparrows: they all made big entrances, achieved iconic status and then proved that they could hardly thrive beyond the confines of their original trilogies. And that’s not to say that they have been forgotten, or that the ill-advised fourth installments of their franchises didn’t do well. Indiana Jones is a hero we still raise our children on; the mechanics of the Bourne films changed the way directors shot action movies (Bond’s Quantum of Solace among them); and Captain Jack is the most iconic movie character of the last ten years.

But none of them are Bond.

None of them would work if they re-cast their star; none have the ability to adapt so firmly to the changing times and trends as 007; and none of them have retained (or will retain) such a stranglehold on the pop cultural mindset as Bond…James Bond. From vodka martinis (shaken, not stirred) to Q-branch gadgets to Aston Martin automobiles to Armani Tuxedos, James Bond remains the action hero that men, to this day, like to fancy themselves as most. He’s a slick, charismatic badass, a remarkably smooth womanizer; he’s a man who has been to every exotic locale in the book, whose actions and efforts exist outside the law and extend past the reach of any authority. To put it briefly, he is the epitome of “cool,” and the fact that he has been able to remain that way for 50 years is, arguably, the single most impressive feat in the history of cinematic storytelling or marketing.

But Bond didn’t get where he is today simply by being a concept that appealed to a lot of people. No, along the way, there have been some truly excellent cinematic moments as well. For every stumble the series has had (and there have been a few, Roger Moore’s space-traveling farce, Moonraker, and Pierce Brosnan’s Die Another Day chief among them), there have been two enjoyable action movies and one genuinely great adventure to compensate.

So what films are the best? Which classics should you dig up in anticipation of Skyfall? Check back tomorrow as the Western Herald counts down the best of the best, the films that fit into the aforementioned “genuinely great” category and that, justifiably, have risen to the top of the James Bond canon for enthusiasts and casual fans alike.

Argo

Argo
Warner Bros. Pictures, GK Studios, 2012
Directed by Ben Affleck
Starring: Ben Affleck, Alan Arkin, John Goodman, Bryan Cranston
A-

The first 15 minutes of, Argo, Ben Affleck’s latest film, depict a militant mob of Iranian extremists storming the gates of the United States embassy in Tehran. The scenes build with explosive intensity: embassy workers burning and shredding sensitive documents in a furious race against time, windows shattering and doors breaking down as the mob closes in, response crews shooting smoke grenades into the unruly masses in an attempt to neutralize the situation. Affleck stages the set-piece with the same breathless pace and meticulous attention to detail that marked the opening heist in his 2010 thriller The Town, effortlessly providing a hook for a historical film that never once crosses into textbook-reciting territory. That the scenes manage to build such riveting action is rendered even more impressive by the fact that the film’s star and major supporting players don’t even enter the picture until later. This introduction is all about the set-up: about the rising tension in Iran, about the hostage situation within the embassy and, most notably, about the six hostages that sneak out a back exit and disappear.

When it reaches the CIA that the six escapees are hiding out with a friendly Canadian ambassador (a reliably solid Victor Garber), extraction specialist Tony Mendez (Affleck) and his supervisor Jack O’Donnell (Bryan Cranston) hatch a rescue mission revolving around a fake science fiction film. With the help of a CIA-connected make-up artist (John Goodman) and a charismatic Hollywood producer (Alan Arkin), Mendez builds an elaborate cover scheme around a bogus science fiction epic (the titular Argo) and an even-more bogus “location scouting trip.” The idea is that the six in-limbo ambassadors will pose as Mendez’s (Canadian) film crew as he scouts Iranian locales for possible film settings. After they have all played the charade for a few days, they will get on an airplane, fly back to the United States and be home free: needless to say, things don’t play out quite so simply.

Affleck, an Academy Award-winning screenwriter for Good Will Hunting has been on somewhat of a role lately, kicking off his directorial career with a pair of Boston-centered crime dramas (Gone Baby Gone and the aforementioned The Town) that gained both critical acclaim and audience approval. But Argo branches away from Affleck’s “Southie” stomping grounds, following its globe-trotting narrative and vast ensemble cast with the sweep of classic thrillers. Affleck drives the production with a craftsman’s eye for detail, adopting authentic costumes and a grainy, 70s-esque cinematography technique that recalls the work of all-time-great directors like Frances Ford Coppola, Roman Polanski and Sydney Pollack. He also takes the lead role, bringing the same kind of internalized conflict, drive and intensity that marked his leading turn in The Town. It’s not a showy performance, but it is a subtle and nuanced one, a showcase of an actor/director who, even when he casts himself as the hero, is still willing to let his supporting cast steal the show. It was that directorial mentality that helped net Jeremy Renner a Best Supporting Actor nomination in 2010 (also for The Town) and part of the reason that Argo is receiving such widespread critical acclaim.

Affleck’s trend of drawing terrific performances from his actors continues here, with a slate of known and unknown commodities coalescing to form the year’s strongest ensemble. The noisiest and showiest role goes to Oscar winner Alan Arkin (Little Miss Sunshine), who embodies loud-mouthed, profane and hilarious Hollywood producer Lester Siegel with aplomb (“If I’m going to make a fake movie, it’s going to be a fake hit!” he exclaims early on), but equally fun is John Goodman, channeling his career-best work from the cult classic The Big Lebowski into the role of celebrated make-up artist John Chambers. The two get to spend most of their screen-time playing off one another and their onscreen relationship is one of the film’s greatest strengths, a gleeful, endlessly rewarding storyline that serves as a perfect foil to the tense central plot.

But while Arkin is getting the majority of the Oscar buzz, the best-in-show here is Bryan Cranston, whose commanding passion and emotional energy anchor the film’s third act. Those who have seen Cranston light up the small screen in AMC’s Breaking Bad (a show for which he won three consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards) know that he is one of the best actors working today and will doubtlessly enjoy watching him play a role more in the “good guy” corner here. And while Arkin and Goodman get the lion’s share of the film’s one-liners, Cranston gets arguably the definitive one (“This is the best bad idea we’ve got,” he dryly remarks to a superior in the State Department). The rest of the cast is filled out by lesser-known talents, actors and actresses who step into the roles of the ambassadors and bring appropriate gravity, fear and restlessness to their situation…all as the walls begin to close in. Each scene the six of them share with Affleck feels entirely organic.

As far as Oscar talk is concerned, with a 96% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a tremendously consistent box office performance, Argo is currently the Best Picture frontrunner, and it’s not at all hard to figure out why. Not only is the film strong across all filmmaking benchmarks (from acting, to directing, to craft categories like Cinematography and Costume Design), it also offers the same kind of tribute to Hollywood that made The Artist such an unstoppable force last year. The way the film lovingly (and often, hilariously) portrays the moviemaking process is nothing short of infectious, injecting the film’s serious subject matter with a lighthearted tilt, and making it difficult to envision anything resonating more consistently with Academy audiences this year. Will Argo win Best Picture? And will the guy who starred in such critical and commercial disasters as Gigli and Surviving Christmas walk away from the 85th annual Academy Awards with a Best Director Oscar in hand? Only time will tell, and a lot of things could certainly change between now and the Feb. 25 ceremony, but as of right now, both of those things seem exceedingly likely. I, for one, could hardly be more pleased.