The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Rings
New Line Cinema and Wingnut Films, December 19th, 2001 (United States Wide)
Starring: Ian McKellen, Elijah Wood, Viggo Mortensen
Four stars
Ten years ago today, New Line Cinema unleashed what
would ultimately, I think, go on to be the definitive accomplishment in cinema for
the decade. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring was the
new millennium’s second big event picture, the first having launched just a
month before (though it would take much longer to complete that particular
series). That film was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, the first
of an eight film series that would go on to become the highest grossing
franchise in movie history. I saw both films on incredibly memorable days, and
both movie going experiences are ones that I still recall happily and
nostalgically a decade later, even when hundreds of other movies have come and
gone. It was, I think, the beginning of my love for film.
I saw the first Harry Potter film on my 11th
birthday, which is, coincidentally, also the birthday that Harry celebrates
early on in the story. At that point, only four of the Potter books had
been released, but I loved all of them, and they had instilled in me a passion
for reading that I think few people my age ever experienced (and one that I
haven’t quite been able to regain, to this day). The movie was decent, if
unspectacular. It stayed true the books and the cast, especially the adult
characters, played by some the finest British actors of this era, was quite
excellent, but I always felt like there was something missing. The Potter
books have always had this addictive element to me, something that keeps me
reading and makes me want to finish them in one sitting. That’s something only
a few books have ever gotten out of me, but the movie was missing that spark.
Everything about it was technically fine, but there was something missing, and
my 11 year old mind didn’t know what it was; not yet, at least.
I saw The Lord of the Rings just over a month later,
on Christmas Eve 2001. At this point in time, my step dad was reading me the
first book in the trilogy every evening, but we hadn’t gotten very far yet, and
I had little idea of the story’s epic scope. I also had no idea that we were
walking into a three hour film, but I didn’t mind one bit that it ended up
being that long, because from the first frame, I was more enthralled with this
film than I think I’ve ever been by any other, before or since. There were
moments from that first viewing that are still pretty much burned into my mind:
Gandalf’s reading of the text on the ring, the nightmarish Moria sequence, the
final battle and Boromir’s farewell, to name a few. These were moments that
brought these characters to life for me, drew me into this story that I was
mostly unfamiliar with, and made me fall in love with it. These were moments
that scared me, moved me or excited me; moments that exemplified everything that
made movies like these classics, from Star Wars to E.T. to Back
to the Future and now to this. Walking out of the theater on that cold but
beautiful winter’s night, I was pretty sure it was the greatest film I’d ever
seen; it’s still in the running.
The reason The Lord of the Rings triumphs where so
many other literary adaptations partly or completely fail (I think the Potter
films fall into the former category) all comes down to the director. Peter
Jackson makes a case for himself as one of the greatest directors of all time
on the strength of these films alone, even if he never nears that level of greatness
again. The Lord of the Rings doesn’t rise above most adaptations simply
on the strength of its source material or on its technical marvels (both of
which are considerable), or even on the abilities of its vast and supremely
talented ensemble cast. No, the greatness inherent in these films is there
because, above all, this was a passion project for Peter Jackson, and his love
for these books and these characters can be felt in every frame of every film,
in every casting decision and performance and in every spectacular effect. It’s
possible there are other directors who could have undertaken this project and
done well with it, but I find it hard to imagine that there is another director
who could have brought the same emotional sensitivity to these stories that Jackson
finds so easily in every moment. In lesser hands, The Lord of the Rings
could have become first and foremost a special effects piece: indeed, part of
the reason for my lukewarm reaction to films like James Cameron’s Avatar
(which was partially inspired by these films) was based on the fact that I
never felt emotionally connected to the characters or the stories they had to
tell. Yes, the visual effects in that film are among the greatest of all time,
but it’s a film I have forgotten and a film I have never felt inclined to
revisit because it seemed like a pale imitation of what Jackson
had achieved more than half a decade earlier with this series. I’ve seen Fellowship
probably 20 times, and every single time, I still get the same visceral,
emotional reactions to certain scenes as I always have. And yes, the special
effects were and still are excellent, but in making this film, Jackson
did what the likes of Michael Bay
and so many other Hollywood blockbuster directors would
never even consider: he emphasized the human side of these tales rather than
trying to hide them behind special effects.
There aren’t enough things that I can praise about these
films, but two aspectss that have always struck me are the cast and the adapted
screenplay. There’s not a weak link in the former, in any of these three films.
Jackson and his crew don’t go for big star power here, but the first time I saw
the film, I still found myself picking out plenty of familiar faces, from Sean
Bean (one of my favorite actors in one of my favorite performances, as Boromir)
to Ian McKellen, who is likely the “best-in-show” in the series, and whose work
for this film should have earned him an Oscar. Elsewhere, less familiar actors
caught my eye and promised greatness, whether they lived up to that promise (Viggo
Mortensen, who has since done some very compelling and interesting work) or not
(Orlando Bloom, who has pretty much only played guys who complain a lot). As
for the screenplays, the work done in that category is strong across the three
films, but never, I think, has an adaptation been executed as perfectly as this
first film. The cuts and changes that Jackson and co make are the right ones,
bringing extra drama to the early parts of the story and creating a more
compelling film. The few characters that are excised aren’t really missed
(reading back through the books, I remember how happy I am that Tom Bombadil
was cut), while the characters that are more fleshed out, like Liv Tyler’s
Arwen (to give Aragorn a more present love story) or especially Christopher Lee’s
Saruman, who provides a face for the growing darkness that permeates most of
the series’ first part, are drawn quite naturally, always remaining true to the
spirit of the book.
And that brings me back to my 11 year old self, the one who
couldn’t quite put his finger on what he didn’t like about that first Harry
Potter film. It turns out there was something missing, and that was
the amount of love that Jackson
injected into his project that none of the four Potter directors could
ever find. Maybe that kind of passion can only arise when the stories stand the
test of time, and maybe a later incarnation of the Potter series
(because everyone knows that it’s coming eventually) will find a director that
can do for those books what Jackson did for Rings. There are actually a
good handful of moments of real greatness in the Harry Potter films, and
they all have one thing in common: the director or screenwriter has a moment of
inspiration, and takes the Potter legacy into their own hands. And maybe
just for a scene or two, those movies stop feeling like adaptations, like ways
to make money off of an existing fanbase, and start feeling like films. There’s
never a moment of any less than that in Jackson’s
Lord of the Rings, and that’s why these films will live forever among my
favorites of all time. There are a lot of people who would call Fellowship
the best in the series. It’s impossibly difficult for me to pick a favorite,
since every time I watch any one of the films, I’m inclined to call it just
that, but Fellowship is certainly the truest book-to-film transition
and, as most films at the beginning of any series do, it feels the most
complete on its own. But whether or not I will ever be able to call one of
these films my favorite, whether I would choose the quiet, building darkness of
Fellowship, the epic bombast of the The Two Towers or the
triumphant, chill inducing finale of The Return of the King, one thing
is for certain: these films made me into the movie lover that I am today, and
there is no greater gift a film can give than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment